The Performance of Black History Month Under Trump’s Watch
Black History Month just started, and Trump wasted no time reminding us that symbolism without substance is the name of the game. Late on January 31, just one minute before midnight, his office quietly released a memo recognizing Black History Month. It name-dropped Black icons like Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, and Tiger Woods. But while the administration was handing out performative pats on the back, behind the scenes, it was working overtime to dismantle policies that actually uplift Black communities.
Behind the Curtain: What Trump’s Administration Did While “Celebrating” Black History Month
While the statement paid lip service to Black excellence, Trump’s administration made moves that hit Black communities where it hurts. Here’s what they actually did:
Dismantled DEI offices – Gutting diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in federal agencies and beyond.
Ended MLK Day & Juneteenth observances – No official recognition of two of the most significant days for Black progress.
Froze federal grants for Black businesses – Cutting off vital funding streams for Black entrepreneurs.
Put Black federal workers on "leave of absence" or forced retirement buyouts – A quiet but deadly strategy to push Black professionals out of government roles.
This is what modern suppression looks like. No burning crosses, no blatant “Whites Only” signs—just policies that remove resources, block economic mobility, and erase Black futures while pretending to celebrate Black history.
Symbolism vs. Substance: The Real Threat to Black Progress
Trump’s approach is a masterclass in performative politics. We get a month, a speech, a proclamation—but no investment, no policies that drive real change. Recognizing Black history while actively working to erase Black futures is gaslighting at the highest level.
Take a closer look at the names in his statement. Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman? Undeniable heroes of resistance. But Clarence Thomas and Thomas Sowell? These are the Black faces white conservatives love because they don’t challenge the system. They’re used as shields to justify the dismantling of racial progress.
This strategy isn’t new. It’s the same old playbook of erasure wrapped in a neatly packaged memo. Acknowledge history while stripping the present of resources. Celebrate Black achievements while undermining Black mobility. It’s the same game, just with a new face.
Key Quotes from the Clip
"They recognize Black history while erasing Black futures."
"This is what modern suppression looks like: They don’t say 'no Black people allowed.' Instead, they remove resources, silence voices, and block economic growth."
"Symbolism is a distraction—real change comes from policy, investment, and opportunity."
What Can We Do About It?
Call It Out – Don’t let performative politics fly under the radar. Expose it, talk about it, and keep the conversation alive.
Support Black-Owned Businesses – If the government won’t invest in us, we must invest in ourselves.
Push for Policy Change – Advocate for DEI programs, Black business funding, and federal protections against economic suppression.
Stay Engaged in Politics – Local elections matter just as much as federal ones. Support candidates who back real policies for Black communities.
What’s Worse: Outright Racism or Subtle Erasure?
Real talk—do you prefer your racism upfront and obvious, or hidden under the guise of “celebration”? Is it worse when they tell you to your face, or when they smile while cutting off your resources? Let’s talk about it. Drop your thoughts in the comments and let’s keep this conversation going.
🔥 Subscribe to Kin+ for more real, unfiltered breakdowns. Because if we don’t tell our stories, they’ll rewrite them for us.
Share this post